22th Congress of the CPSU

The 22nd Congress of the Soviet Communist Party was held from October 17 to October 31 1961. In fourteen days of sessions (October 22nd was a day off), 4,413 delegates, representing 9,176,000 party members, in addition to delegates from 83 foreign Communist parties within and outside the bloc, listened to Khrushchev and others review policy issues and lay down a new line.Khrushchev dominated the scene. The occasion did not, however, mark his elevation to complete and unchallenged ascendancy. His vicious attacks on Albania and on China by implication have brought responses that belied the official claim of bloc-wide unity.For several years, Soviet and Chinese leaders have differed over the degree of harshness to show toward the West, the Chinese generally being far more orthodox and bitter than Khrushchev. In his opening speech at the 22nd Congress, Khrushchev attacked the Communist regime of Albania for its unreformed Stalinist orthodoxy, and the chorus was taken up by other Soviet and foreign Communist speakers. However, Zhou Enlai, head of the Chinese Communist delegation, refused to agree and criticized Khrushchev for airing ideological differences in front of the world. "To lay bare a dispute between fraternal parties openly in the face of the enemy," he said, "cannot be regarded as a serious Marxist-Leninist attitude." Speakers for five other Communist parties (North Korea, north vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, and India) sided with China in refusing to criticize Albania. On October 21, Zhou Enlai placed two wreaths at the base of the Lenin-Stalin mausoleum, one of them "To Joseph Stalin- the great Marxist-Leninist," and at the end of the next day he walked out of the Congress. Moscow said his departure for Beijing on the 23rd was connected with an approaching session of the All-China Assembly, but when Mao Tse-tung and others met Zhou in Peking, no such meeting was mentioned. Although Khrushchev accompanied Zhou to the airport on the evening of his departure it was evident that there was a genuine ideological rift that could not be smoothed over.