Babylonian numerals
Babylonian numerals were written in
cuneiform, using a wedge-tipped
reed stylus to make a mark on a soft
clay tablet which would be exposed in the
sun to harden to create a permanent record.
The
Babylonians, who were famous for their astrological observations and calculations (aided by their invention of the
abacus), used a
sexagesimal (base-60) positional
numeral system inherited from the
Sumerian and also
Akkadian civilizations. Neither of the predecessors was a positional system (having a convention for which ‘end' of the numeral represented the units).
This system first appeared around
1900 BC to
1800 BC. It is also credited as being the first known place-value
numeral system, in which the value of a particular digit depends both on the digit itself and its position within the number. This was an extremely important development, because prior to place-value systems people were obliged to use unique symbols to represent each power of a base (ten, one-hundred, one thousand, and so forth), making even basic calculations unwieldy.
Since their system clearly had an internal
decimal system and they used 60 as the second smallest unit instead of 100 as we do today, it is more appropriately considered a
mixed-radix system of bases 10 and 6. A large value to have as a base, sixty is the smallest number that can be wholly divided by two, three, four, five, and six, hence also ten, fifteen, twenty, and thirty. Six and ten were also used as sub-bases. Only two symbols used in a variety of combinations were used to denote the 59 numbers. A space was left to indicate a
zero, although they later devised a sign to represent an empty place.
Sexagesimals still survive to this day, in the form of
degrees (360° in a circle),
minutes, and
seconds in
trigonometry and the measurement of
time.
A common theory is that sixty was chosen due to its
prime factorization 2×2×3×5 which makes it divisible by
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
10,
12,
15,
20, and
30.
Integers and
fractions were represented identically - a
radix point was not written but rather made clear by context.
 |
Babylonian_numerals.jpg |
Babylonian numerals
The Babylonians did not technically have a digit for, or a concept of, the number
zero. Although they understood the idea of nothingness, it was not seen as a numberâ€"merely the lack of a number. What the Babylonians had instead was a space (and later a disambiguating placeholder symbol) to mark the nonexistence of a digit in a certain place value.
*{{cite book
last = Menninger | first = Karl W. | year = 1969 | title = Number Words and Number Symbols: A Cultural History of Numbers | publisher = MIT Press | id = ISBN 0262130408 *{{cite book | last = McLeish | first = John | year = 1991 | title = Number: From Ancient Civilisations to the Computer | publisher = HarperCollins | id = ISBN 0006544843*Babylonia *Babylon *First usage of negative numbers *Numeral system* Babylonian numerals * Cuneiform numbers * Babylonian Mathematics
|