Phenomenology
This article treats the philosophical movement of phenomenology. For other meanings see Phenomenology (Disambiguation).Phenomenology has three meanings in philosophical history, one derived from
G.W.F. Hegel in 1807, one derived from
Edmund Husserl in 1920, and one derived from
Martin Heidegger in 1927.
For
G.W.F. Hegel, phenomenology is an approach to
philosophy that begins with an exploration of phenomena (what presents itself to us in conscious experience) as a means to finally grasp the absolute, logical, ontological and metaphysical Spirit that is behind phenomena. This has been called a
"dialectical phenomenology".
For
Edmund Husserl, phenomenology is an approach to
philosophy that takes the intuitive experience of phenomena (what presents itself to us in phenomenological reflexion) as its starting point and tries to extract from it the essential features of experiences and the
essence of what we experience. This has been called a
"transcendental phenomenology". Husserl's view stems from the
School of Brentano and was developed further by philosophers such as
Maurice Merleau-Ponty,
Max Scheler,
Hannah Arendt,
Dietrich von Hildebrand and
Emmanuel Levinas.
For
Martin Heidegger, the phenomenological vision of a world of beings must be bypassed toward the apprehension of the Being behind all beings, that is, as an introduction to ontology, albeit an ontology that remains critical of metaphysics. This has been called an
"existential phenomenology".
The phenomenological dispute between Husserl and Heidegger influenced the development of
existential phenomenology and
existentialism in
France, as is clear from the work of
Jean-Paul Sartre and
Simone de Beauvoir;
Munich phenomenology (
Johannes Daubert,
Adolf Reinach,
Alexander Pfänder in
Germany and
Alfred Schütz in Austria); and
Paul Ricoeur.
While the term "phenomenology" was used several times in the
history of philosophy before Husserl, modern use ties it more explicitly to his particular method. Following is a list of thinkers in rough chronological order who were instrumental in the development of phenomenology, with brief comments on their contributions:
*
Friedrich Christoph Oetinger (1702-1782) (
German pietist) for the study of the "divine system of relations"
*
David Hume (1711-1776)
Scottish philosopher, called variably a
skeptic or a common sense advocate. While this connection is somewhat tendentious, Hume in his
A Treatise of Human Nature does take a seemingly phenomenological or psychological tack, describing the process of reasoning causality (what he may be most famous for) primarily in psychological terms and also being the source of the Kantian distinction between phenomenological and noumenal reality.
*
Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728â€"1777) (
mathematician,
physician and
philosopher) for the theory of appearances underlying empirical knowledge.
*
Immanuel Kant (1724â€"1804) declared that human beings can only know phenomena, and that the truth, the thing-in-itself, the noumena, is beyond the capability of the human mind.
*
Georg Hegel (1770â€"1831) developed the term, phenomenology, by challenging Kant's doctrine of the Unknowable Thing-in-itself, and declared that by knowing phenomena more fully we can gradually arrive at a consciousness of the absolute and spiritual truth of Divinity. Hegel's
Phenomenology of Spirit, published in 1807, prompted many opposing views including the existential work of
Søren Kierkegaard,
Martin Heidegger and
Jean-Paul Sartre, as well as the materialist work of
Marx and his many followers.
*
Franz Brentano (1838-1917) seems to have used the term in some of his lectures at
Vienna. Also, he had
Edmund Husserl as a disciple, and could have influenced his views on
intentionality.
*
Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) redefined it at first as a kind of descriptive psychology and later as an epistemological, foundational
eidetic discipline to study
essences. He is known as a "father" of phenomenology.
*
Carl Stumpf (1848-1936) used it to refer to an ontology of sensory contents.
*
Max Scheler (1874-1928)developed further the phenomenological method of Edmund Husserl and extended it to include also a reduction of the
scientific method. He influenced the thinking of
Pope John Paul II and Edith Stein.
*
Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) criticized Husserl's theory of phenomenology as he attempted to develop a theory of ontology that led him to his original theory of Dasein, the abstract human being.
*
Alfred Schutz (1899-1959) developed a phenomenology of the social world on the basis of everyday experience which has influenced major sociologists such as Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann.
Later usage is mostly based on or (critically) related to Husserl's introduction and use of the term. This branch of philosophy differs from others in that it tends to be more "descriptive" than "
prescriptive".
Husserl derived many important concepts that are central to phenomenology from the works and lectures of his teachers, the philosophers and psychologists
Franz Brentano and
Carl Stumpf.An important element of phenomenology that Husserl borrowed from Brentano was
intentionality, the notion that the main characteristic of
consciousness is that it is always
intentional. Intentionality, which could be summarised as "aboutness" of thought, describes the basic structure of consciousness. Every mental phenomenon or psychological act is directed at an object — the
intentional object. Every belief, desire, etc. has an object to which it refers: the believed, the desired. The property of being intentional, of having an intentional object, is the key feature which distinguishes mental/psychical phenomena from physical phenomena (objects), because physical phenomena lack intentionality altogether. Intentionality is the key concept by means of which phenomenological philosophy attempts to overcome the subject/object dichotomy prevalent in modern philosophy.
Precursors and influences
*
Skepticism (for the concept of the epoché)
*
Descartes (Methodological doubt,
cogito)
*
British empiricism (Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Mill)
*
Immanuel Kant and
neokantianism (for Husserl's transcendental turn)
*
Franz Brentano (for the concept of intentionality and the method of descriptive psychology)
*
Carl Stumpf (psychological analysis, influenced Husserl's early works)
In the
Logical Investigations, his first major work (still under the influence of Brentano), Husserl still conceives of phenomenology as descriptive psychology. Husserl analyzes the intentional structures of mental acts and how they are directed at both real and ideal objects. The
Logical Investigations begin with a devastating critique of psychologism i.e. the attempt to subsume the a priori validity of the laws of logic into psychology. Husserl establishes a separate field for research in logic, philosophy and phenomenology, independently from the empirical sciences.
Some years after the publication of the
Logical Investigations, Husserl made some key elaborations which led him to the distinction between the act of consciousness (
noesis) and the phenomena at which it is directed (the
noemata).
* "noetic" refers to the intentional act of consciousness (believing, willing, hating and loving ...)
* "noematic" refers to the object or content (noema) which appears in the noetic acts (respectively the believed, wanted, hated and loved ...).
What we observe is not the object as it is in itself, but how and inasmuch it is given in the intentional acts. Knowledge of
essences would only be possible by "bracketing" all assumptions about the existence of an external world and the inessential (subjective) aspects of how the object is concretely given to us. This procedure Husserl called
epoché.
Husserl in a later period concentrated more on the ideal, essential structures of consciousness. As he wanted to exclude any hypothesis on the existence of external objects, he introduced the method of phenomenological reduction to eliminate them. What was left over was the pure transcendental ego, as opposed to the concrete empirical ego. Now (transcendental) phenomenology is the study of the essential structures that are left in pure consciousness: this amounts in practice to the study of the noemata and the relations among them. German philosopher
Theodor Adorno criticised Husserl's concept of phenomenological epistemology in his
metacritique "Against Epistemology", which is anti-
foundationalist in its stance.
Transcendental phenomenologists include:
Oskar Becker,
Aron Gurwitsch and
Alfred Schutz.
After Husserl's publication of the
Ideen in 1913, many phenomenologists took a critical stance towards his new theories. Especially the members of the
Munich group distanced themselves from his new
transcendental phenomenology and preferred the earlier
realist phenomenology of the first edition of the
Logical Investigations.
Realist phenomenologists include:
Adolf Reinach,
Alexander Pfänder,
Johannnes Daubert,
Max Scheler,
Roman Ingarden, and
Nicolai Hartmann.
Existential phenomenology differs from transcendental phenomenology by its rejection of the transcendental ego. Merleau-Ponty objects to the ego's transcendence of the world, which for Husserl leaves the world spread out and completely transparent before the conscious. Heidegger thinks of conscious being as always and already in the world. Transcendence is maintained in existential phenomenology to the extent that the method of phenomenology must take a presuppositionless starting point - transcending claims about the world arising from, for example, natural or scientific attitudes or theories of the ontological nature of the world.
Heidegger's "phenomenology" and differences with Husserl
While Husserl thought philosophy to be a scientific discipline that had to be founded on a phenomenology understood as
epistemology,
Heidegger held a radically different view.
Heidegger himself phrases their differences this way:
For Husserl, the phenomenological reduction is the method of leading phenomenological vision from the natural attitude of the human being whose life is involved in the world of things and persons back to the transcendental life of consciousness and its noetic-noematic experiences, in which objects are constituted as correlates of consciousness. For us, phenomenological reduction means leading phenomenological vision back from the apprehension of a being, whatever may be the character of that apprehension, to the understanding of the being of this being (projecting upon the way it is unconcealed). According to
Heidegger philosophy was not at all a scientific discipline, but more fundamental than science itself. According to him science is only one way of knowing the world with no specialized access to truth. Furthermore, the scientific mindset itself is built on a much more "primordial" foundation of practical, everyday knowledge.
Husserl was skeptical of this approach, which he regarded as quasi-mystical, and it contributed to the divergence between their thinking.
Instead of taking phenomenology as
prima philosophia or a foundational discipline, Heidegger took it as a metaphysical ontology:
"being is the proper and sole theme of philosophy". Yet to confuse phenomenology and ontology is an obvious error. Phenomena are not the foundation or Ground of Being. Neither are they appearances, for as Heidegger argues in "Being and Time", an appearance is "that which shows itself in something else," while a phenomenon is "that which shows itself in itself."
While for Husserl, in the epochè, being appeared only as a correlate of consciousness, for
Heidegger being is the starting point. While for Husserl we would have to abstract from all concrete determinations of our empirical ego, to be able to turn to the field of pure consciousness, Heidegger claims that:
"the possibilities and destinies of philosophy are bound up with man's existence, and thus with temporality and with historicality".
However, ontological being and existential being are different categories, so Heidegger's conflation of these categories is, according to Husserl's view, the root of Heidegger's error.Husserl charged Heidegger with raising the question of ontology but failing to answer it, instead switching the topic to the Dasein, the only being for whom Being is an issue. That is neither ontology nor phenomenology, according to Husserl, but merely abstract anthropology.
(
NB: Heidegger quotations are taken from
The Basic Problems of Phenomenology (
1954), published by Indiana University Press,
1975.
Introduction, p. 1 â€" 23 reproduced at
www.marxists.org.)
Existential phenomenologists include:
Martin Heidegger (
1889 â€"
1976),
Hannah Arendt (
1906 â€"
1975),
Emmanuel Levinas (
1906 â€"
1995),
Gabriel Marcel (
1889 â€"
1973),
Jean-Paul Sartre (
1905 â€"
1980),
Paul Ricoeur (
1913 -
2005), and
Maurice Merleau-Ponty (
1907 â€"
1960).
Daniel Dennett has criticized phenomenology on the basis that its explicitly first-person approach is incompatible with the scientific third-person approach, going so far as to coin the term
autophenomenology to emphasize this aspect and to contrast it with his own alternative, which he calls
heterophenomenology.
*
Phenomenology of religion*
Hermeneutics*
Structuralism*
Poststructuralism*
Existentialism*
Deconstruction*
Philosophy of technology*
Emergy*
Personhood Theory*
Important publications in phenomenological psychology* Dermot Moran,
Introduction to Phenomenology (Oxford: Routledge, 2000) - Charting phenomenology from Brentano, through Husserl and Heidegger, to Gadamer, Arendt, Levinas, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and Derrida.
* Robert Sokolowski, "Introduction to Phenomenology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000) - An excellent non-historical introduction to phenomenology.
* Herbert Spiegelberg, "The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction" (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1965) - The most comprehensive and thorough source on the entire phenomenological movement. Unfortunately expensive and hard to find.
* David Stewart and Algis Mickunas, "Exploring Phenomenology: A Guide to the Field and its Literature" (Athens: Ohio University Press 1990)
* Michael Hammond, Jane Howarth, and Russell Kent, "Understanding Phenomenology" (Oxford: Blackwell 1995)
* Christopher Macann, "Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty" (New York: Routledge: 1993)
* William A. Luijpen and Henry J. Koren, "A First Introduction to Existential Phenomenology" (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press 1969)
* Richard M. Zaner, "The Way of Phenomenology" (Indianapolis: Pegasus 1970)
* Hans Köchler, "Phenomenological Realism: Selected Essays" (Frankfurt a. M./Bern: Peter Lang, 1986)
* Pierre Thévenaz, "What is Phenomenology?" (Chicago: Quadrangle Books 1962)
* ed. James M. Edie, "An Invitation to Phenomenology" (Chicago: Quadrangle Books 1965) - A collection of seminal phenomenological essays.
* ed. R. O. Elveton, "The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings" (Seattle: Noesis Press 2000) - Key essays about Husserl's phenomenology.
* eds. Richard Zaner and Don Ihde, "Phenomenology and Existentialism" (New York: Putnam 1973) - Contains many key essays in existential phenomenology.
*
Albert Borgmann and his work in philosophy of technology.
*
Bulletin d'analyse phénoménologique*
Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts*
Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology*
Research in Phenomenology*
Studia Phaenomenologica*
Newsletter of Phenomenology*
What is Phenomenology?*
About Phenomenology*
About Edmund Husserl*
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry*
Organization of Phenomenology Organizations O.P.O.*
Romanian Society for Phenomenology