Quality control
For other uses of this term, please see Quality Control (disambiguation).In
engineering and
manufacturing,
quality control and
quality engineering are involved in developing systems which ensure that
products or
services are designed and produced to meet or exceed customer requirements and expectations. These systems are often developed in conjunction with other business and engineering disciplines using a cross-functional approach.
Though terms like 'quality engineering' and 'quality assurance' are relatively new, the ideas have existed just as long as the very art of
tool manufacture. Simple tools made of
rock or
bone were subject to familiar modes of failure. They could be fragile, dull where they should be sharp, sharp where they should be dull, etc. When the first specialized
craftsmen arose, manufacturing tools for others, the principle of quality control was simple: "let the buyer beware" (
caveat emptor).
The first
civil engineering projects, however, needed to be built to
specifications.
Craft and tradespersons
During the
Middle Ages,
guilds took the responsibility of quality control upon themselves. All practitioners of a particular trade living in a certain area were required to join the corresponding guild, and the guild instituted punishments for members who turned out shoddy products.
Royal government purchasing
material were interested in quality control as customers. For instance, King
John of England appointed a certain William Wrotham to supervise the construction and repair of ships. Some centuries later, but also in England,
Samuel Pepys, Secretary to the
Admiralty, appointed multiple such overseers.
Prior to the extensive
division of labor and
mechanization resulting from the
Industrial Revolution, it was possible for a workman to control the quality of his own product. Working conditions then were more conducive to professional pride.
The Industrial Revolution led to a system in which large groups of men performing a similar type of work were grouped together under the supervision of a foreman who also took on the responsibility to control the quality of work manufactured.
Quality Assurance has developed a good deal during the last 80-90 years (in about 20 year intervals) from its inception to the current state of the art.
Wartime production
During
World War I, the manufacturing process became more complex, and the introduction of large numbers of workers being supervised by a
foreman designated to ensure the quality of the work, which was being produced. This period also introduced
mass production and
piecework, which created quality problems as workmen could now earn more money by the production of extra
products, which in turn led to bad workmanship being passed on to the
assembly lines.
Due to the large amount of bad workmanship being produced, the first full time
inspectors were introduced into the large-scale modern
factory. These full time inspectors were the real beginning of inspection quality control; and this was the beginning of large inspection organizations of the 1920s and 1930s, which were separately organized from production and big enough to be headed by
superintendents.
The systematic approach to quality started in industrial manufacture during the 1930s, mostly in the
USA, when some attention was given to the cost of
scrap and
rework. With the impact of
mass production, which was required during the
Second World War, it became necessary to introduce a more stringent form of quality control which can be identified as
statistical process control (SPC). Some of the initial work for SPC is credited to
Walter A. Shewhart of
Bell Labs.
This system came about with the realisation that quality cannot be inspected into an item. By extending the inspection phase and making inspection organizations more efficient, it provides inspectors with control tools such as
sampling and
control charts.
SQC had a significant contribution in that it provided a sampling inspection system rather than a 100 per cent inspection. This type of inspection however did lead to a lack of realisation to the importance of the engineering of product quality.
For example, if you have a basic sampling scheme with an
acceptance level of 4%, what happens is you have a
ratio of 96% products released onto the market with 4% defective items – this obviously is a fair risk for any company/
customer – unless you happen to be one of the unfortunate buyers of a defective item.
Postwar
After World War II, the United States continued to apply the concepts of inspection and sampling to remove defective product from production lines. However, there were many individuals trying to lead U.S. industries towards a more collabrative approach to quality. Excluding the U.S., many countries' manufacturing capabilities were destroyed during the war. This placed American business in a position where advances in the collabrative approaches to quality were essentially ignored.
After World War II, the U.S. sent
General Douglas MacArthur to oversee the re-building of Japan. During this time, General MacArthur invited two key individuals in the development of modern quality concepts:
W. Edwards Deming and
Dr. Joseph Moses Juran. Both individuals promoted the collaborative concepts of quality to Japanese business and technical groups, and these groups utilized these concepts in the redevelopment of the Japanese economy.
Late twentieth century
In the late twentieth century, the extremely low tolerance of failure of such devices such as manned spacecraft, nuclear power plants, or life saving drugs created extremely refined approaches to quality control that place heightened constraints on managers developing such projects. In space exploration, victories or failures of quality control produce dramatic results- either the
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster or the victory of the
Mars Exploration Rovers after a high failure rate of probes to that planet.
Studies of the Challenger and
Columbia disasters highlight the nature of the friction between quality control and managers attempting to achieve aggressive schedules. It is a friction that has become familiar to high stakes technology product development when rigorous
software testing or
clinical trials of new drugs reveal product weaknesses.
*
Go/no go*
Six Sigma*
Software quality and
software testing*
Playtest*
Validation*
Manufacturing*
List of production topics*
Total Quality Management (TQM)
*
Kenneth G. Swift*
List of software engineering topics*
Computerized system validation*
Good Manufacturing Practice* Health care quality improvement organizations, or
QIOs.
*
Product qualificationExternal links
*
QA Podcast: Recorded conversations about techinical and business QA topics*
Open Directory*
Citations from CiteSeer*
Software Testing and Quality Control - Outline
*
Linux Kernel Scalable Test Platform*
Agility an Issue and Requirements Tracking Software from AgileEdge*
Open source software testing tools*
Medical Transcription Quality Assurance Institute*
The online community for software testing & quality assurance professionals*
Stickyminds website for all things connected with software testing - associated with "Better Software" Magazine*
Methods & Tools: on-line magazine with many articles on software testing and quality*
Statistical Quality Control Online: tables, calculators and procedures*
Basic information on Quality*
Quality GurusReferences
*
Federal Standard 1037C*
MIL-STD-188