AllExperts > Encyclopedia 
Search      
Find out about volunteering to AllExperts

Southall rail crash: Encyclopedia BETA


Free Encyclopedia
 Index · Browse A-Z  · Questions and Answers ·
Encyclopedia

Browse A-Z
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZNum


License
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
Free Online Courses
12 Weeks to Weight Loss
Take Charge of Stress
Learn How to Bake
Budgeting 101
Deeper Faith
DIY Fashion Makeover

       MORE E-COURSES
 
   

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z  Misc

Southall rail crash

The remains of Coach G of the HST

The Southall rail crash occurred on September 19, 1997, on the Great Western Railway line at Southall, west London. Six people were killed and over 150 were injured.

The crash occurred after the 1032 Great Western Intercity passenger train from Swansea to London Paddington, operating with a defective Automatic Warning System indicator, went through a red signal (SPAD) and collided with a freight train leaving its depot shortly before 13:20 local time.

If the AWS equipment on the HST passenger train had been working, the chance of the accident occurring would have been very substantially reduced, though not completely eliminated, since the AWS is only an advisory system. The driver's attention had been distracted and he did not observe the preceding signals visually but AWS would have given him a clear audible warning. Automatic train protection equipment would have almost certainly prevented the accident. The train was fitted with ATP but this was also switched off. At the time of the accident, the ATP equipment was not required to be switched on and had proved troublesome in service, and drivers were not required to be trained in it. Following this accident and the Ladbroke Grove rail crash, the train operating company Great Western now requires all its HST trains to have ATP switched on (if the equipment is faulty the train is taken out of service).

The driver was initially charged with manslaughter but the case was dropped. Great Western Trains was fined £ 1.5 million for not having a system to ensure high speed trains were not operated for long journeys with AWS inoperative.

In hindsight, the action of the signalman in giving the freight train precedence over the HST with the faulty AWS has been criticised. However, this was a perfectly standard manoeuvre, and he would not have been aware that the HST AWS was faulty. One possible solution might have been to have defined a train headcode that indicates a faulty AWS , for example "AWSF", and instruct signalmen to treat such trains with extra care, including giving such trains priority. However, the key point, as identified in the report, was that drivers had become increasingly reliant on AWS with single-manning and high speeds, and that it was no longer acceptable to run trains at full speed if the equipment was inoperative. Operating rules were changed accordingly.

External links

*BBC News On this day article
*Health and Safety Commission report by Professor John Uff published 24 February 2000. 14 MB pdf file.
*Report by the Health and Safety Executive on progress made on the recommendations of the original report (February 2002). 333 kB pdf file.

References

*



Email this page
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.
This is the "GNU Free Documentation License" reference article from the English Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. See also our Disclaimer.